Research image management practices reported by scientific literature: Studies that explore the use and production of images in research
البيانات و الموارد
-
Analyzed articlesXLSX
Set of 109 articles and information regarding image management.
معلومات إضافية
حقل | القيمة |
---|---|
المؤلف | Joana Rodrigues, Carla Teixeira Lopes |
آخر تحديث | مايو 3, 2024, 14:56 (UTC) |
أنشئت | مايو 24, 2023, 10:20 (UTC) |
Citation | Research image management practices reported by scientific literature: Studies that explore the use and production of images in research |
Creation date | January 2020 - October 2022 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.25747/k9f6-kt23 |
تنسيق | .xlsx |
اللغة | EN |
Methodology | The overall selection process followed the PRISMA statement (Liberati et al., 2009). We use the Web Of Science (WoS) and considered the five main research areas of WoS: Arts and Humanities (ArtH), Life Sciences and Biomedicine (LifeSB), Physical Sciences (PhyS), Social Sciences (SocS), and Technology (Tech). Instead of defining a search query, as typically done in systematic reviews, we included the most relevant articles per research domain. Note that we do not want to collect articles related to a specific topic. Instead, we want to gather the most important papers in each discipline and analyze their image-management practices. To pick the most relevant articles for each domain, we selected the 10 most cited articles in Web of Science, per year, between 2010 and 2021. In addition, articles should be in the English language and in open access. Overall, we identified 600 articles. Of these, 109 (18.2%) constituted the final sample. The articles that caused any doubt about the inclusion/exclusion were read almost in full. Of the 109 documents, 29 (26.6%) belong to the domain of Arts and Humanities, 23 (21.1%) of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, 2 (1.8%) of Social Sciences, 21 (19.3%) of Physical Sciences and 34 (31.2%) of Technology. |
Temporal Coverage | 2010-2021 |